Mayflower District Court
#in-re-lachiescripts
This is the start of #in-re-lachiescripts channel.
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-07 07:57 a.m.
## Minute Order to Show Cause ##
Whereas, Prosecutor LachieScripts made the following statement to the Court, with the intention to guide and explain to the Court why the State's first witness could authentic the State's Exhibit A:
Cc:@lachie
Prosecutor LachieScripts cites a 1997 9th Circuit opinionUnited States Rodriguez , published in vol. 125 in the third series of the federal reporter. He cites the 2nd page of this opinion. However, this Court and opposing counsel could not find a copy of United States v. Rodriguez (9th Cir. 1997) 125 F.3d 739, 741, leading the Court to believe Prosecutor LachieScripts either (a) attempted to mislead the court or (b) recklessly used Generative AI LLMs such as ChatGPT.
Whereas, Prosecutor LachieScripts made the following statement to the Court, with the intention to guide and explain to the Court why the State's first witness could authentic the State's Exhibit A:
Cc:
Apologies for the delay, Your Honour.
Officer @infernovalkos did not record Exhibit A personally yet he qualifies as an expert video analyst who examined the footage during his investigation. Federal Rule of Evidence 703 permits experts to use unprepared materials in their work as long as these materials align with the typical reliance of experts in their field. The court established this principle in United States v. Rodriguez (9th Cir. 1997) 125 F.3d 739, 741 where expert testimony based on non-expert-created evidence received court approval. We request the admission of Exhibit A through expert authentication.Prosecutor LachieScripts cites a 1997 9th Circuit opinion
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-07 07:57 a.m.
Prosecutor LachieScripts is ordered to (1) submit a copy of United States v. Rodriguez (9th Cir. 1997) 125 F.3d 739, 741 (2) Or to show cause as to why they must not be found in contempt—pursuant to5 M.S.C § 2104.1 which permits sanctions for "misbehavior in the presence of the court or near thereto obstructing the administration of justice", "misbehavior by an officer of the corut in official transactions" and "disobedience to a...lawful command"—for attempting to mislead the court.
The contemnor is informed that not giving a sufficient explanation for their actions will lead to the application of penalties without them being able to contest or provide any explanation. These sanctions may include jail time, a fine and referral to the Mayflower State Bar.
SO ORDERED, this Monday, 7th of July, 2025.
/s/Singhski
D.C.J
The contemnor is informed that not giving a sufficient explanation for their actions will lead to the application of penalties without them being able to contest or provide any explanation. These sanctions may include jail time, a fine and referral to the Mayflower State Bar.
SO ORDERED, this Monday, 7th of July, 2025.
/s/
D.C.J
Singhski ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-07 07:58 a.m. @singhski has added @lachie to the case channel.
Case Modified
singhski pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:11 p.m.
singhski pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:11 p.m.
lachie 2025-07-07 10:42 a.m.
Your Honour, State v Memphis was my first ever case that went to trial alone with no assistance. I knew I would make mistakes, one of which was calling up the affiant of the AoPC first, instead of the Correctional Officer who recorded Exhibit A. This was a grave and silly mistake, and it lied in the fault of my unpreparedness and lack of experience and knowledge. I scrambled, and tried to find a solution. Following, I thought to believe that maybe there was a case were an expert witness could authenticate evidence he did not personally take/make. At the time, I thought to believe the quickest solution was asking ChatGPT for case law that supported this argument. ChatGPT then produced United States v. Rodriguez, to which I, naively and stupidly, did not think to fact check due to once again, my lack of experience and knowledge, which is no excuse. I presumed that this case would of course be existent, as to why would it provide it if it wasn’t? I now see that AI solutions can be incorrect and once again a grave mistake was made to submit this into the record. My intention was not to mislead the court in any way. My only goal was to support my argument in good faith. I ask for forgiveness, however accept full responsibility and respect your decision completely.
CC:@singhski
CC:
lachieYour Honour, State v Memphis was my first ever case that went to trial alone with no assistance. I knew I would make mistakes, one of which was calling up the affiant of the AoPC f...
vloqsouls 2025-07-07 11:42 a.m.
I'm just confused because you contradicted yourself by saying it was a "clerical error" and then admitted that was a lie in direct presence of the court.
vloqsouls 2025-07-07 11:42 a.m.
That really hurt my feelings, us Clerks have a difficult job in maintaining documents
vloqsouls 2025-07-07 11:44 a.m.
Only for us to get the blame for mistakes made in the course of advocacy as a result of negligence
vloqsoulsThat really hurt my feelings, us Clerks have a difficult job in maintaining documents
vloqsouls 2025-07-07 11:50 a.m.
Clerks "are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality." Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee , No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99 , 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
vloqsoulsThat really hurt my feelings, us Clerks have a difficult job in maintaining documents
lachie 2025-07-07 11:57 a.m.
Clerks are the foundation of the courts and I have high respect and I believe you guys don’t get enough recognition
lachie 2025-07-07 11:57 a.m. 
lachie 2025-07-07 11:57 a.m.
The “document” in this case was the paragraph in response
lachieClerks are the foundation of the courts and I have high respect and I believe you guys don’t get enough recognition
vloqsouls 2025-07-07 12:01 p.m.
I agree
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-08 05:28 p.m.@lachie I'm going to make this easy, do you want an essay or monetary damages?
Singhski ᴘᴄlachie 2025-07-08 05:38 p.m.
May you please elaborate on both the monetary damages in question and what the essay entails exactly?
vloqsouls 2025-07-08 05:43 p.m.
The essay will be about attorney ethics obviously
vloqsouls 2025-07-08 05:43 p.m.
But if you sing Hotel Room Service by Pitbull on a voice note we can shorten the length of the pages
vloqsoulsThe essay will be about attorney ethics obviously
vloqsouls 2025-07-08 05:45 p.m.
Specifically how attorneys should learn to navigate generative AI in conducting legal research
vloqsouls 2025-07-08 05:45 p.m.@lachie If I were you I'd take the essay
vloqsouls 2025-07-08 05:47 p.m.
If you use AI you start over
lachieMay you please elaborate on both the monetary damages in question and what the essay entails exactly?
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-08 05:52 p.m.
Usage of generative AI in legal advocacy
vloqsoulsIf you use AI you start over
lachie 2025-07-09 12:48 a.m.
Essay about not using ai made by ai 
Singhski ᴘᴄUsage of generative AI in legal advocacy
lachie 2025-07-09 12:49 a.m.
Apologies for the confusion, I meant more about which the consequences were entailing. For eg; monetary punishments would be 10.000 fine etc
lachieEssay about not using ai made by ai
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-10 12:43 p.m.
You don't have to use AI? In fact if you did I would utilize incarceration as a punishment.
lachieApologies for the confusion, I meant more about which the consequences were entailing. For eg; monetary punishments would be 10.000 fine etc
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-10 12:43 p.m.
We have decided the monetary punishment will be a sum of $50,000 UCD.
Singhski ᴘᴄWe have decided the monetary punishment will be a sum of $50,000 UCD.
lachie 2025-07-10 12:48 p.m.
And how long would the essay be?
Singhski ᴘᴄYou don't have to use AI? In fact if you did I would utilize incarceration as a punishment.
lachie 2025-07-10 12:48 p.m.
It was a joke, your honour. I apologise for the miscommunication
lachieIt was a joke, your honour. I apologise for the miscommunication
vloqsouls 2025-07-10 01:01 p.m.
This is not a laughing matter.
vloqsoulsThis is not a laughing matter.
lachie 2025-07-10 01:22 p.m.
Thank you, clerkistrate
lachieThank you, clerkistrate
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-10 01:32 p.m.
??
UserMessage could not be loaded.
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-10 01:32 p.m.
Singhski ᴘᴄ??
lachie 2025-07-10 01:35 p.m.
Your honour, my deepest apologies. This is a horrible, horrible error. More importantly, I express unimaginable sorrow to MiLord @vloqsouls . I hope one day this remark can be forgiven.
lachieAnd how long would the essay be?
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-11 07:05 a.m.
16 pages
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-13 01:10 p.m.@lachie
lachie 2025-07-13 01:11 p.m.
Apologies your honour, I will pay the 50,000 UCD
lachieApologies your honour, I will pay the 50,000 UCD
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-20 06:13 a.m.
Okay @vloqsouls
Singhski ᴘᴄOkay @vloqsouls
lachie 2025-07-20 05:26 p.m.
I pay it to @vloqsouls ?
lachieI pay it to @vloqsouls ?
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 11:24 a.m.
Make payable to the Clerk of the Court
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 11:25 a.m.
hold on let me check if I can set the fine from the GUI
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 11:28 a.m.@lachie Issued
Singhski ᴘᴄlachie 2025-07-21 01:08 p.m.
Do I still have to go ingame?
bommes 2025-07-22 11:33 a.m.
...how else do you expect to pay the fine?
Singhski ᴘᴄ 2025-07-26 11:00 a.m.@lachie Yes, have you made the payment?
Singhski ᴘᴄlachie 2025-07-27 02:15 a.m.
Sorry, trying to sort out funds. Will pay soon
lachie 2025-07-30 03:38 a.m.@vloqsouls @singhski
lachie 2025-07-30 03:39 a.m.
i have the funds and intend to pay ASAP
lachie 2025-07-30 03:39 a.m.
could i be directed where to pay exactly?
lachie 2025-07-30 03:39 a.m. 